9 Comments
User's avatar
Sahil's avatar

People find it hard? Game is easy for me. </troll>

Expand full comment
Garrett Palm's avatar

Game of the scene is just whatever the one naturally funny person in class is doing.

Expand full comment
Tony Bozanich's avatar

UCB: Don't think. Also, our philosophy of improv asks you think more!

Expand full comment
Steve Improv-able's avatar

I feel like the game is hard to teach. It’s like a wave that forms. You first need to see it, then get on it, and hopefully your scene partners get on too.

Expand full comment
Francisco Antillón's avatar

At the end, playing game is focusing the discovery and exploration to one particular, out of the ordinary thing. One could say it's even easier to pour all attention to the one thing instead of the whole rest of reality!

Expand full comment
Margot Escott's avatar

So timely, thanks! I'm glad your wrote this now as I was teaching a class and did find it hard to teach game of the scene. I find using videos from SNL & Key Peele can help show this!

Expand full comment
Worlds Oldest Intern's avatar

Peak improv teacher energy❤️

Expand full comment
Deema's avatar

I've taken Miles Stroth recently and trying to overthink less, currently. Just find a character that would do that unusual thing and be it. You're still playing the game, but it's built-in into the scene type, everything else is just specifics.

Have you tried position play, Will?

Expand full comment
paris adkins's avatar

I’ve been thinking about what a Weapons improv form would be— what I wrote up to try is:

Set follows one character at a time in a few scenes. At the end of the scenes, someone new comes in and does something crazy (unrelated to the game so far?). We then cut to their portion of the story, going back in time to what led them to that moment, then further into the future. We repeat with each character until an insane conclusion.

I’m curious if you think that’s too close to a Close Quarters!

Expand full comment